Monday, March 23, 2009
Which conference will be the biggest loser?
BigEastDream or BigEastReality?
From espn.com article:
How are conferences faring?
| Conference | Teams | W-L | Sweet 16 |
| Big East | 7 | 11-2 | 5 |
| Big Ten | 7 | 6-5 | 2 |
| ACC | 7 | 5-5 | 2 |
| Big 12 | 6 | 9-3 | 3 |
| Pac-10 | 6 | 6-5 | 1 |
| Atlantic 10 | 3 | 3-2 | 1 |
| SEC | 3 | 1-3 | 0 |
| Horizon | 2 | 1-2 | 0 |
| Mountain West | 2 | 0-2 | 0 |
Ugh
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Hockey
Yale Wins!
No argument here
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Go to Hell North Carolina
If you mean, is it your
Is it my turn yet?
Gonzaga
Not a good year for the West Coast. I'm now stuck rooting for Gonzaga, a team from Eastern Washington, which is more or less Idaho. Snowy, sparsely populated... and the few people who do live there vote Republican.
I've been inspired by the groundswell in favor of comments, and have switched my vote from nay to yea. But if we do wind up enabling comments, I hope people don't bury a great post in a comment field.
Age Grouping
Surrogate Smack Talker
Thanks for talking some smack on my behalf!
Since Will suggested that we Georgians relax about basketball and just
post pictures of our kid, I'll take him up on that. Chuck, since I
snuck up on you in your age bracket, the picture is of Eston showing
off his hat from his second favorite team that is not in the tournament.
I'm not sure whether picture attachments will show up on the blog from
an email, but I'm giving it a shot.
Lauren
Age Grouping
A Matter of Faith
Not about winning
Irony or upsets versus solid picks
I made some gutsy choices that won. #11 Dayton, #12 Arizona, #9 Texas A&M, #10 Maryland, #12 Western Kentucky, #10 Michigan, and #9 Sienna. I am tied for second with absolutely no chance of winning and maybe no chance of the top 90%..
Why don’t I have a chance to win? I went with two safe choices, #4 Wake Forrest and #5
Lucy and I returned to baseball tonight, taking Mary Croom, Luis, and
Sorry for the bitter rant but I need to get back to bridge where at least if I lose it is on my own bidding and play rather than some twenty-year-old kid.
Thomas F. McDow
Friday, March 20, 2009
Posting via Email
All
To post to the blog, send an email to: mcdowhoop[dot]mcdowhoops[at]blogger[dot]com. Where [dot] = . and [at] = @.
The subject line is the post title and the email body is the text. Be sure to sign you email.
Also, I suggest folks add an * to your real bracket. It's hard to distinquish which brackets rightfully deserve scorn.
Will
Apples to Appleton
Don't wait
Randolph - don't wait on the smack, if you've got it. The opportunity won't last long.
How's Ga Tech doing in the NIT?
Will
Sugar Smacks
Here it is. My time of glory. I don't care what Clarkson says, it's going to last. This bracketosopher is ready for the next round.
I can't remember the last time I was in the 97th percentile of anything.
For the record, it appears Coach K was taken out of context. But he's still what his detractors say he is.
(Also, Todd, I loved that photo of the University of Washington.)
**UPDATE 3/20, 9:28 pm**
Well that was short-lived... 87th percentile is much less exciting.
Never Fall in Love with an Underdog
Enjoy it now, Piers; or the Leader Board, 3/20
Awake?
Thursday, March 19, 2009
First Impressions
Bracketology vs. Bracketometry
The Eight-Team Pool
Obviously I'm rooting for the University of Washington and, as I did last year with WSU, I now provide you all with some home-state photography (this is the UW campus).
So I wound up entering four pools, which is a lot for a guy who won't watch any games at all (our TV gets no reception). The office pool, the courthouse pool, the Audacity of Hoops, and an unusual pool run by med school friends, "the eight-team pool."
In the eight-team pool, you pick eight teams and every time one wins, you earn the number of points corresponding to that team's rank. So if you pick UNC, you'll probably receive 4 or 5 points total, 1 point for each win. Whereas if you picked Maryland, you already would have 10 points in the bag... but you'd have run the risk of zero points from that team.
One strategy would be to try to pick the likeliest upsets (Maryland, Texas A&M, USC, Tennessee) and hope you're right on all of them and win 80 or 90 points. If you think the winner is sure to be someone who just happens to make amazingly lucky picks, then your only hope of winning is to try to be that amazingly lucky person. In other words, to generate a score high enough to win, you're forced to bet on risky outcomes.
My hope is that there are not enough people in the pool for someone to get lucky on every single pick. So I went for a blended approach, with some "sure thing" bets and some stretches, hoping that some better-than-expected performances will net me an average of eight points from each of my eight teams. My picks were: Kansas, Wake Forest, West Virginia, USC, Duke, UCLA, Texas, Clemson.
Thoughts? I see now that if Duke and Texas both win, they would play each other the next round, so that was a dumb move.
