Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Lauren's Predictions
| Bracketologist | Current rank | Predicted final rank | Predicted final total |
| MMGumby 3, M. Gumbinner | 1 | 1 | 1388.75 |
| HarborBirnbaum 1, R. Birnbaum | 2 | 2 | 1350 |
| gte233v 1, L. McDow | 3 | 3 | 1305 |
| keithleykeithley 1, T. Keithley | 5 | 4 | 1215 |
| *SC Education Bracket, T. McDow | 11 | 5 | 1155 |
| Deese Picks Are Winners, S. Deese | 8 | 6 | 1086.25 |
| winner or whiner?, N. Jenkins | 10 | 7 | 1072.5 |
| A-10 > SEC, J. Gumbinner | 12 | 8 | 1058.75 |
| *Will.I.Am.Still.Alive, W. McDow | 14 | 9 | 1031.25 |
| *Jim Goff-PawPaw's Picks, W. McDow | 16 | 10 | 1031.25 |
| Prez_O_Picks, W. McDow | 17 | 11 | 1031.25 |
| randmcgt 1, R. McDow | 20 | 12 | 1003.75 |
| NIB (nell's impulse ), N. Jenkins | 21 | 13 | 990 |
| nbjenkins 1, N. Jenkins | 26 | 14 | 921.25 |
| Ol' Cat-Stew, M. Jenkins | 6 | 15 | 900 |
| Mr. Pick , e. black | 9 | 16 | 877.5 |
| AU is in. Mason is not., D. Leonhardt | 13 | 17 | 855 |
| BIG BAD BRIAN 53 , B. Richards | 15 | 18 | 843.75 |
| Maggie Lou Wins, D. McDow | 4 | 19 | 810 |
| Captain 'Cuse, P. Turner | 7 | 20 | 790 |
| Jonah the Whale, D. Leonhardt | 18 | 21 | 740 |
| Felix the Cat, D. Leonhardt | 19 | 22 | 740 |
| *e.fitzbasketball, E. Fitzpatrick | 22 | 23 | 700 |
| Dode Has Nose for Pickin', D. McDow | 23 | 24 | 690 |
| molvigo 1, O. Molvig | 24 | 25 | 680 |
| *Leslie, W. McDow | 25 | 26 | 670 |
| Yankee Interloper, G. Raskin | 27 | 27 | 640 |
| MookMcD 1, m. rincon | 28 | 28 | 590 |
| Pops, C. McDow | 29 | 29 | 550 |
| BigEastDream, P. Turner | 30 | 30 | 550 |
| Domable, D. Rincon | 32 | 31 | 550 |
| The Underdog, T. McDow | 31 | 32 | 510 |
| RUSHwantsO'sBRACKETtoFAIL, D. McDow | 33 | 33 | 400 |
| eleanor's mascot prefs, O. Molvig | 34 | 34 | 370 |
| googlelovesamerica, E. Fitzpatrick | 35 | 35 | 300 |
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Alma Ada Mada Mater
Hopped up on Sugar Smacks
Comment to Dodie's post
Posting to a Blog Is Not Easy for Oldtimers
Give me a smack and I'll smack you back.
Basketball fans. My platform for smackdaliation just grew immeasurable higher when the Louisville Cardinals failed to live up to their high billing and handle Michigan State. My bread is in the oven and I am about to be toast. I am comfortably tied for 14th place and have a grand total of zero more points available. And I am not even good at losing. I'm the second highest ranking person with zero possible points left. Once again Piers is my better.
But that is not what this post is about. I will wallow in self pity over on Twitter. With only 140 characters.
I am here to set the record straight.
Maggie Lou still wanted Pitt to win. She was disappointed with their loss, but when she heard that she was still highly ranked, she shrugged and did what any sensible person would do: she said the serentity prayer. Or at least she channelled it. Smiling with a this-is-not-what-I-wanted-but-I-guess things-might-turn-out-OK grin. And then when I told her that Louisville also lost, she looked up from the game she was playing with Franklin and said, "Oh well. I don't even like basketball anyway. Its so stupid. All you do is throw that ball through the hoop." She will think differently when she learns to type faster.
On ad alma materum attacks. Please. Especially looking for the false equivalents (Georgia Tech's intramural champ vs. Lawrence's varsity). What about Georgia Tech's stoner frats? I am sure they could not hold a smoldering doobie to what LU could roll out. Or hot midwesterners with a nasal twang. Nothing. Regardless, it is pointless. Piers even goes after Chuck Stew for his crunchy college's lack of smackitude. What does one's college say about them? Not much. And certainly the athletes, er, student-athletes, don't represent the school. Even at some of the oldest and most famous universities in the country, the social and intellectual lines between the recruited athletes and the regular students is wide. And I know because Todd's roommate was one.
The last point should carry over to academics too. Florida State is now getting fried for academic improprieties for their athlete-students, and I am sure that they are not any worse than the other schools in their conference and all that play at their level. (Spare me the Duke stories, Will. I smack my hands on your court.) A reliable source in Chapel Hill has informed me of the high level of intervention that comes from the athletic department for students in big time sports. And I am sure the SUC and the Big Least are as bad or worse. I realized during the election that what we hate about politics is what we hate about college sports. In politics, they pretend its about ideas but it's really about winning. In college sports, they pretend that they care about academics, but it's about winning. Principles go out the window when they help the ball go through the hoop.
And those back benchers who keep complaining about the lack of smack: everyone likes talking about the weather, but nobody does anything about it. Todd called some people onto the electronic carpet, and that is good. But this is a collective venture, and unless you put your hyperbole where your common sense used to be, we're no where. Having put in my 200 cents, let me add to Todd's roll call:
Clarkson, where are you? Don't tell me you don't know how to blog. You at least know how to send email, and your responsible son explained how to do it via email here.
Thomas, what about you. You respond "to all" via email at a drop of a hat. Consider my backward baseball cap dropped.
Looking forward to hearing from you all.
Todd - It's been too long...
Updates I'd like to see
After today's games are over, I'd love to see the following updates:
1. Lauren: Will you be running your predictions again this year, based on remaining available points, to tell us who is likely to win?
2. Dodie: When will you tell us how Maggie Lou responded to Pittsburgh's loss? It's a really interesting question if Louisville wins. After today's games, let us know whether Maggie Lou is an idealist, sticking to her principles no matter what, or a pragmatist, happy with a bracket that's accidentally still in the running.
3. Ron: I know you're busy with your residency, but I'm still hoping for one post out of you.
4. Erin: Our hats are off to you for wading in with a smart-alecky comment about oldsters passing as youngsters. Keep up the good work!
5. Will: Is this your blog or not? If you don't make a few more cracks, I will petition for an update of the Duke photo atop the blog, replacing it with this lovely shot of Syracuse:
6. Abby and Margaret: You can't tell me you don't know how to blog -- I read your blogs every week! Throw some posts up here.
7. Finally, Mary Ann made a comment that I thought should be aired as a post (possibly for self-serving reasons), so I'm promoting it here (along with Piers's response):
Mary Ann: As a casual observer of the March Madness, I agree with some other contributors that the smack talk has very disappointing this season. I care nothing about who wins what game but I love to read the banter. This year it has been slow to say the least. Are so many of you depressed over your standing in the brackets that you cannot get up the energy to contribute some read-worthy smack? If it weren't for Piers and Todd, I would quit logging onto this site.
Piers: Our basketball smack may not be so good, but our smack smack is flourishing, it seems.
Bracket = busted
Saturday, March 28, 2009
See ya later, Raskin!
Villanova
My bracket has Duke beating Pittsburgh and going to the Final Four, so in order to get back in the running I need Villanova to beat Pittsburgh. This strategy agrees with Meredith, since her father, uncle, aunt, and cousins attended Villanova. (Her first cousins currently own and run "Kelly's," a Villanova bar/hangout.) So here's hoping that Raskin and Maggie Lou will shed some more tears tonight!
I join Raskin's call for more smack. In particular, how did Leonhardt's lunatic post about Yale hockey slide through with barely a responding peep? Perhaps because most McDows were hanging out in Rock Hill that weekend, riding horses and pickup trucks instead of tending their blog.
I hate to beat up on Raskin since I live in New York with him and have ample opportunity to beat up on him here. But if Villanova wins maybe I'll take another crack at him.
Friday, March 27, 2009
If there's a silver lining in this
Ugh. Now I know what Duke fans feel like.
halftime
Is it just me or
Flame retardant uniforms?
SuperNova?
Isn't a supernova an imploding star? I hope the shoe fits.
But from what I've seen, they'll continue to shine.
Thursday, March 26, 2009
SuperNova!
RE: Chuck Stew Called the Tiger Stew
That half court shot by Mizzou covered more distance than all of Duke's first half field goals. Let's see if Coach K earns his gold in this one. 'Nova's good, very good, but I'm still hopeful that Clarkson picked this one correctly. Go Memphis!! Where else can you beat your feet in the mississippi mud?
Chuck Stew Called the Tiger Stew
their feet out of the mud and come a long way back (did any one see
the 60-foot shot Missouri swished at the end of the first half?),
Chuck will be the only one in the top half of our pool to have called
this one correctly.
Stressful but ultimately satisfying
Maggie Lou Made Me Write This
When is brunch?
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Low quality
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Monday, March 23, 2009
roster
In case you were wondering
The Citadel has a bulldog With short and grizzly hair. Carolina has a gamecock-- Now wouldn't they make a pair? And when they get together There's bound to be a scrap. Just watch that Citadel Bulldog Wipe that gamecock off the map!
CHORUS
Oh! they rambled, they rambled. They rambled all around. In and out of town, Oh! they rambled, they rambled. They rambled 'till the Bulldogs cut `em down.
Must have been hard for Clarkson when he then went to USC for law school.Which conference will be the biggest loser?
BigEastDream or BigEastReality?
From espn.com article:
How are conferences faring?
| Conference | Teams | W-L | Sweet 16 |
| Big East | 7 | 11-2 | 5 |
| Big Ten | 7 | 6-5 | 2 |
| ACC | 7 | 5-5 | 2 |
| Big 12 | 6 | 9-3 | 3 |
| Pac-10 | 6 | 6-5 | 1 |
| Atlantic 10 | 3 | 3-2 | 1 |
| SEC | 3 | 1-3 | 0 |
| Horizon | 2 | 1-2 | 0 |
| Mountain West | 2 | 0-2 | 0 |
Ugh
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Hockey
Yale Wins!
No argument here
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Go to Hell North Carolina
If you mean, is it your
Is it my turn yet?
Gonzaga
Not a good year for the West Coast. I'm now stuck rooting for Gonzaga, a team from Eastern Washington, which is more or less Idaho. Snowy, sparsely populated... and the few people who do live there vote Republican.
I've been inspired by the groundswell in favor of comments, and have switched my vote from nay to yea. But if we do wind up enabling comments, I hope people don't bury a great post in a comment field.
Age Grouping
Surrogate Smack Talker
Thanks for talking some smack on my behalf!
Since Will suggested that we Georgians relax about basketball and just
post pictures of our kid, I'll take him up on that. Chuck, since I
snuck up on you in your age bracket, the picture is of Eston showing
off his hat from his second favorite team that is not in the tournament.
I'm not sure whether picture attachments will show up on the blog from
an email, but I'm giving it a shot.
Lauren
Age Grouping
A Matter of Faith
Not about winning
Irony or upsets versus solid picks
I made some gutsy choices that won. #11 Dayton, #12 Arizona, #9 Texas A&M, #10 Maryland, #12 Western Kentucky, #10 Michigan, and #9 Sienna. I am tied for second with absolutely no chance of winning and maybe no chance of the top 90%..
Why don’t I have a chance to win? I went with two safe choices, #4 Wake Forrest and #5
Lucy and I returned to baseball tonight, taking Mary Croom, Luis, and
Sorry for the bitter rant but I need to get back to bridge where at least if I lose it is on my own bidding and play rather than some twenty-year-old kid.
Thomas F. McDow
Friday, March 20, 2009
Posting via Email
All
To post to the blog, send an email to: mcdowhoop[dot]mcdowhoops[at]blogger[dot]com. Where [dot] = . and [at] = @.
The subject line is the post title and the email body is the text. Be sure to sign you email.
Also, I suggest folks add an * to your real bracket. It's hard to distinquish which brackets rightfully deserve scorn.
Will
Apples to Appleton
Don't wait
Randolph - don't wait on the smack, if you've got it. The opportunity won't last long.
How's Ga Tech doing in the NIT?
Will
Sugar Smacks
Here it is. My time of glory. I don't care what Clarkson says, it's going to last. This bracketosopher is ready for the next round.
I can't remember the last time I was in the 97th percentile of anything.
For the record, it appears Coach K was taken out of context. But he's still what his detractors say he is.
(Also, Todd, I loved that photo of the University of Washington.)
**UPDATE 3/20, 9:28 pm**
Well that was short-lived... 87th percentile is much less exciting.
Never Fall in Love with an Underdog
Enjoy it now, Piers; or the Leader Board, 3/20
Awake?
Thursday, March 19, 2009
First Impressions
Bracketology vs. Bracketometry
The Eight-Team Pool
Obviously I'm rooting for the University of Washington and, as I did last year with WSU, I now provide you all with some home-state photography (this is the UW campus).
So I wound up entering four pools, which is a lot for a guy who won't watch any games at all (our TV gets no reception). The office pool, the courthouse pool, the Audacity of Hoops, and an unusual pool run by med school friends, "the eight-team pool."
In the eight-team pool, you pick eight teams and every time one wins, you earn the number of points corresponding to that team's rank. So if you pick UNC, you'll probably receive 4 or 5 points total, 1 point for each win. Whereas if you picked Maryland, you already would have 10 points in the bag... but you'd have run the risk of zero points from that team.
One strategy would be to try to pick the likeliest upsets (Maryland, Texas A&M, USC, Tennessee) and hope you're right on all of them and win 80 or 90 points. If you think the winner is sure to be someone who just happens to make amazingly lucky picks, then your only hope of winning is to try to be that amazingly lucky person. In other words, to generate a score high enough to win, you're forced to bet on risky outcomes.
My hope is that there are not enough people in the pool for someone to get lucky on every single pick. So I went for a blended approach, with some "sure thing" bets and some stretches, hoping that some better-than-expected performances will net me an average of eight points from each of my eight teams. My picks were: Kansas, Wake Forest, West Virginia, USC, Duke, UCLA, Texas, Clemson.
Thoughts? I see now that if Duke and Texas both win, they would play each other the next round, so that was a dumb move.

